Drawing for BEACHCOMBER

USPTO serial 76262051

BEACHCOMBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEACHCOMBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

LAUREL V DINEFF JACKSONDINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED820 W JACKSON BLVD STE 370CHICAGO, IL 60607-3026

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Illuminants, namely, candles, wicks for candles, parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, specifically excluding oil lampsACTIVE—
021Small domestic utensils and containers, namely, strainers, spatula, sieves, graters, containers for foods; containers for kitchen and household use not made of precious metal; articles of china, earthenware, stoneware, porcelain, pottery and ceramics in the nature of figurines, ornaments and containers for kitchen and household use; beverage glassware; glassware, namely, glass plates; ovenware, namely, metal and glass cooking pots and pans; earthenware basins, sugar basins, hand basins, hand basins; bowls; glass bowls; jugs; meal trays and serving trays not made of precious metal; coasters not made of paper and not being table linen; rubber gloves, oven mitts and barbecue mitts for household use; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
024table linen, namely, coasters, table cloths and table napkins not made of paper; table mats not made of paper; tea towels; textile napkins, placemats and wall hangingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2002REINREINSTATED—
May 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance