USPTO serial 76262179
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ATS Asset Tracking Services Inc.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 0S4, CA
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
ATS Asset Tracking Services Inc.
Calgary, CA
ATS Asset Tracking Services Inc.
Calgary, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Costellia
JEFFREY L COSTELLIA NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Devices for tracking and/or locating animate and inanimate objects, namely devices incorporating global positioning system receivers and cellular frequency transmitters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Electronic monitoring [ field of monitoring ] and reporting services, namely, human and property location reporting services, based upon and arising from tracking and/or locating animate and inanimate objects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |