Drawing for NATURALIA

USPTO serial 76262194

NATURALIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURALIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David S. Abrams

DAVID S ABRAMS ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032MINERAL WATER; NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR NON-MEDICINAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, ISOTONIC DRINKS AND JUICE DRINKS CONTAINING WATER; JUICES AND PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING FRUIT JUICE AND SMOOTHIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance