Drawing for SCUBA SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76262553

SCUBA SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCUBA SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. JOHN BARTZ

R JOHN BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ PA6750 FRANCE AVE S STE 350EDINA, MN 55435-1983UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Scuba equipment, namely, masks, fins, and travel bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 18, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 12, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance