USPTO serial 76262797
BLUE WILLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE WILLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | STAINLESS STEEL COOKWARE NAMELY SAUCEPANS, SKILLETS, DEEP CASSEROLES, SHALLOW CASSEROLES, DEEP SAUTES, BOWLS, KITCHEN TOOLS, DUTCH OVENS, STOCKPOTS, STEAMERS, STEAMER INSERTS, DOUBLE BOILERS, DOUBLE BOILER INSERTS, BAKEWARE, LASAGNA PANS, OPEN AND COVERED ROASTERS, AU-GRATINS, CANISTERS AND CANISTER SETS, SERVING BOWLS, SALAD AND SOUP TUREENS, CHAFING SETS, TRIVETS, AND WARMING BASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |