USPTO serial 76263114
ROCK PAPER SCISSORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCK PAPER SCISSORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Pine
JEFFREY A PINE BANIAK PINE & GANNON150 N WACKER DR STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60606-1606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | gaming equipment, namely, gaming, gambling or slot machines, with or without video output; multimedia programs and software recorded on CD-ROM, computer game programs and software for individual or network users, interactive multimedia computer game programs and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |