Drawing for SUGAR SHACK

USPTO serial 76263209

SUGAR SHACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUGAR SHACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030processed coffee and sugarACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 22, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 20, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Mar 26, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jan 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 28, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 23, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance