USPTO serial 76263244
SHRI RAM CHANDRA MISSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHRI RAM CHANDRA MISSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Young
CHARLES J YOUNG RICHEY & YOUNG PC4408 SPICEWOOD SPRINGS RD STE 100AUSTIN, TX 78759-8504UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Providing computer programs downloadable from a global computer network identifying and promoting the Sahaj Marg (natural path) system of practical training in spirituality of the Shri Ram Chandra Mission The downloadable computer programs include speeches and inspirational material encouraging a simple and pious life through training in the essence of Raja Yoga (yoga of the mind), regulation of the mind through meditation and support of a spiritual guide through the use of Pranahuti (yogic transmission) | ACTIVE | Jul 27, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |