USPTO serial 76263566
IMAGES BY TOTES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGES BY TOTES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Poffenberger
JOHN D POFFENBERGER WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | golf accessories and gifts, namely, ball markers; golf ball pick-up device,namely golf ball retrievers, chipping practice net, golf bag club organizer, golf motif shoehorn, home yard golf set, namely, flagstick, flag and cup, multi-function golf tool, practice net, putting cup, putting kit including putting carpet, cup and balls, score recorder and tees; divot repair tools; golf bag accessory pouch for holding beverage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |