Drawing for BEST-BALANCE

USPTO serial 76263585

BEST-BALANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST-BALANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SCALES WITH BUILT-IN DEVICES FOR MEASURING BODY FAT; PEDOMETERSACTIVE—
042PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS; MEDICAL CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL CONDITIONING; SERVICES OF OFFERING INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE CONCERNING PHYSICAL EXAMINATION AND HEALTH MAINTENANCE; SERVICES OF OFFERING INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE CONCERNING WEIGHT-GAIN PREVENTION AND WEIGHT LOSS; SERVICES OF OFFERING INFORMATION CONCERNING NUTRITIONAL AND DIETARY GUIDANCE; SERVICES OF OFFERING INFORMATION AND GUIDANCE CONCERNING BEAUTY TREATMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 24, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance