Drawing for THE THREE GRACES DIVINE, MYSTIC, ETERNAL

USPTO serial 76263651

THE THREE GRACES DIVINE, MYSTIC, ETERNAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE THREE GRACES DIVINE, MYSTIC, ETERNAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfume, toilet water, talcum powder, body spray, scented skin soap, massage oils, bath oils, moisturizing creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2004UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Dec 13, 200244EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 13, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Nov 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 8, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 24, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance