USPTO serial 76263891
WELLDOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WELLDOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SE25 5HL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Chiatalas
JOHN CHIATALAS SCHOOLEYSP O BOX 9SCHOOLEYS MOUNTAIN, NJ 07870-0009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | corporate identity and branding; marketing strategies and research; product launches and re-launches; advertising design; events coordination, management; e-commerce; web marketing and online advertising | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2000 |
| 038 | Communications | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2000 |
| 041 | Audio, video production; CD-ROM and DVD production, 3 D computer animation | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2000 |
| 042 | print media design and production, media planning; copywriting and translation; stand design; photography; strategic conception and development of internet, intranet and extranet solutions | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |