Drawing for SETTING THE STYLE

USPTO serial 76263985

SETTING THE STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARNER, CHRISTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SETTING THE STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky

Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky Novak Druce + Quigg LLP525 Okeechobee Blvd, 15th FloorWest Palm Beach, FL 33401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Dishware sets, namely, plates, bowls, mugs, cups, pitchers, creamer pitchers, sugar bowls, salt and pepper shakers and trivetsACTIVE—
024Table cloths made of vinyl or cloth, place mats made of vinyl or cloth; kitchen towels made of textiles; pot holders; and oven mittsACTIVE—
027Kitchen rugs made of textilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance