USPTO serial 76264035
ELINX ORDER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELINX ORDER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Vick, Jr.
JOHN E VICK JR DORITY & MANNING PAP O BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, order management software provided to enable a user to browse, select, and purchase of products by way of the world wide web, including for example software used to display products to customers, receive and transact billing information and the like; for the building materials industry, also including software that is adapted for use by builders, lumber-yards, building material supply companies, and building material manufacturers, and the like; | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2000 |
| 035 | Business services provided to enable buying and selling by way of electronic commerce on the world wide web, including promoting user access to databases which are capable of enabling purchasing transactions and electronic information sharing between multiple parties, namely linking buyers and sellers of products by enabling the integration of buyer computing systems with vendor computer systems in the building materials industry, including as well services designed to facilitate purchasing transactions for builders, lumber-yards, building material supply companies, and building material manufacturers, | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |