Drawing for Serial No. 76264071

USPTO serial 76264071

Serial No. 76264071

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 76264071?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Fredbeck

ANDREW FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BLANK SMART CARDS, ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO STORE FINANCIAL INFORMATION, PROCESS BILL PAYMENTS, PROCESS PAYMENTS FOR PRODUCT PURCHASES, AND OTHER FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MODULES FOR READING SMART CARDS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR READING ENCODED SMART CARDS; COMPUTER MEMORIES; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR STORING COMPUTER DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR READING SMART CARDS CONTAINING FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND FOR PROCESSING BILL PAYMENTS, PRODUCT PURCHASES AND MONEY TRANSFERS; ONLINE AND OFFLINE ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SYSTEMS, ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS, AUTHENTICATION SYSTEMS, ALL CONSISTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC BILL PAYMENT, ELECTRONIC PURCHASES OF PRODUCTS, CONTROLLING ACCESS TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, AND FOR AUTHENTICATING INDIVIDUALS FOR ACCESS TO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION; AUTOMATIC VENDING MACHINES; FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSE SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS TO PREMISES OR COMPUTER SYSTEMSABANDONED—
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DEBIT CARD AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES; DEBT COLLECTION SERVICES; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; BANKING SERVICES; FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION; CREDIT INQUIRY AND CONSULTATION; CREDIT RATING SERVICES; CREDIT REPORTING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS; SMART CARD AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT TRANSACTIONS; DEBT COLLECTION SERVICES; DEBT COUNSELING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE PAYMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ESTABLISHING FUNDED ACCOUNTS USED TO PURCHASE GOODS AND SERVICES ON THE INTERNET; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA; FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSE SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 7, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 7, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 7, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 19, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 18, 2004PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 3, 200344EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED—
Dec 3, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Dec 3, 2003PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance