USPTO serial 76264071
Serial No. 76264071
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76264071?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KOWLOON, HK
8 Wan Hoi Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Fredbeck
ANDREW FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BLANK SMART CARDS, ENCODED SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO STORE FINANCIAL INFORMATION, PROCESS BILL PAYMENTS, PROCESS PAYMENTS FOR PRODUCT PURCHASES, AND OTHER FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MODULES FOR READING SMART CARDS; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR READING ENCODED SMART CARDS; COMPUTER MEMORIES; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR STORING COMPUTER DATA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR READING SMART CARDS CONTAINING FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND FOR PROCESSING BILL PAYMENTS, PRODUCT PURCHASES AND MONEY TRANSFERS; ONLINE AND OFFLINE ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SYSTEMS, ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS, AUTHENTICATION SYSTEMS, ALL CONSISTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ELECTRONIC BILL PAYMENT, ELECTRONIC PURCHASES OF PRODUCTS, CONTROLLING ACCESS TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, AND FOR AUTHENTICATING INDIVIDUALS FOR ACCESS TO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION; AUTOMATIC VENDING MACHINES; FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSE SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS TO PREMISES OR COMPUTER SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DEBIT CARD AND CREDIT CARD SERVICES; DEBT COLLECTION SERVICES; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; BANKING SERVICES; FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION; CREDIT INQUIRY AND CONSULTATION; CREDIT RATING SERVICES; CREDIT REPORTING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS; SMART CARD AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT TRANSACTIONS; DEBT COLLECTION SERVICES; DEBT COUNSELING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE PAYMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ESTABLISHING FUNDED ACCOUNTS USED TO PURCHASE GOODS AND SERVICES ON THE INTERNET; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA; FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |