USPTO serial 76264605
L3VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with L3VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W. LEEDS
JENNIFER L DEAN DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LOW LIGHT IMAGE SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC DRIVE CIRCUITS THEREFOR; ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS FOR HANDLING AND TRANSMITTING IMAGE DATA; VIDEO CAMERAS AND PARTS THEREFOR; VIDEO CAMERA ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, POWER SUPPLIES, CONTROLS, COOLERS AND SHUTTERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |