Drawing for SENSIGENT

USPTO serial 76264755

SENSIGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSIGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Gwen Peterson

R GWEN PETERSON EMBARCADEROTOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Web-based computer software that optimizes the use of data generated in the industrial and healthcare environments by integrating data from distributed and networked sensors and converting the data into information that optimizes process operations, manages procurement, monitors equipment performance, schedules needed service and facilitates incident-free operationsACTIVE—
042Technical support services for web-based computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 2, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance