USPTO serial 76264757
ALMOST EDIBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALMOST EDIBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Don Mills, Ontario, CA
Don Mills, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglas
LISA W ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP815 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-4078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, namely, skin care cream, skin care milk, skin care lotion, cleansing milk, make-up remover, beauty mask, skin soap, facial wash, body shampoo, bath and shower gel; hair care preparations, namely, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair lotion, hair styling spray, hair treatment mousse, hair styling mousse, hair treatment preparations, hair styling preparations; perfumery, namely, perfume, cologne, eau de toilette; potpourri; incense; massage oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |