USPTO serial 76264991
HOLLIS-EDEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLLIS-EDEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Martens
LISA M MARTENS FISH & RICHARDSON PC12390 EL CAMINO REALSAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | FULL LINE OF PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR IMMUNE MODULATION AND THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND OTHER MEDICAL DISEASES AND DISORDERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |