Drawing for ACCORDUS

USPTO serial 76265018

ACCORDUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCORDUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Palermo

CHRISTOPHER J PALERMO HICKMAN PALERMO TRUONG & BECKER LLP1600 WILLOW STSAN JOSE, CA 95125-5106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Supply chain management systems comprising computer software for data conversion, computer software for electronic data interchange between computer information processing systems, computer software that allows for communication between manufacturers, distributors and purchasers via a global computer network, computer software for detection of faulty terms in negotiated contracts in the field of contract term disputation, and computer database software for use to maintain and update product and material supply contracts, all of which may be downloaded from a global computer network or offered as packaged softwareACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for data conversion, electronic data interchange between computer information processing systems, for enabling communications between manufacturers, distributors and purchasers via a global computer network, computer software for detection of faulty terms in negotiated contracts in the field of contract term disputation, and for use to maintain and update databases of product and material supply contracts; Professional consulting services consisting of computer software consultation, installation and maintenanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance