USPTO serial 76265152
MOON BATHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOON BATHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
George W. Lewis JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FACIAL, HAND AND BODY SKIN CARE CREAM; SKIN CREAM; SKIN CLEANSER; SKIN CLEANSING CREAM; SKIN EMOLLIENTS; FACIAL CLEANSER; SKIN TONERS; SKIN ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS; SKIN REFRESHING CREAMS AND LOTIONS; SKIN SCRUFFING CREAMS AND LOTIONS; CLAY MASKS; SKIN QUENCHING CREAMS AND LOTIONS; SKIN MOISTURIZERS; WRINKLE REMOVING SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM; DEODORANT SOAP; SKIN SOAP; PUMICE STONES FOR PERSONAL USE; CREAMS FOR CELLULITE REDUCTION; HAIR SHAMPOO; SHAMPOO-CONDITIONERS; HAIR CONDITIONERS; BATH GELS; BATH OIL; BODY CREAM; EYE CREAM; PERFUME; LIP PRIMER; MASCARA; MEN'S COLOGNE; AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS; SHAVING CREAM, AFTER-SHAVE BALM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |