USPTO serial 76265185
DUNHILL THREE YEARS MATURED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUNHILL THREE YEARS MATURED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence B, Apaozoe
LAWRENCE B APAOZOE FROSS ZITICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | pipe tobacco | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |