USPTO serial 76265245
RUBBERPREP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2003
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RUBBERPREP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Beard
John L. Beard BUTZEL LONG, PC1909 K. Street NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | SURFACTANT-CONTAINING AQUEOUS SOLUTION IN THE NATURE OF A SURFACE CLEANING AND MODIFICATION SOLUTION FOR TREATING ELASTOMERIC AND OTHER SINGLE-PLY ROOFING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF ETHYLENE PROPYLENE DIENE MONOMER, CHLOROSUPHONATED POLYETHELYLENE, POLYVINYLE CHLORIDE, COPOLYMER ALLOY, POLYISOBUTYLENE, AND THERMOPLASTIC POLYLFINS, ON COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | โ |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Nov 4, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Aug 14, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Jul 11, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Jun 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |