USPTO serial 76265252
LA FAGIANELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2826870Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2004
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA FAGIANELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
90571 Schwaig b. Nurnberg, DE
90571 Schwaig b. Nurnberg, DE
90571 Schwaig b. Nurnberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND R. FERRERA
RAYMOND R FERRERA ARNOLD & FERRERA LLP2401 FOUNTAINVIEW DR STE 630HOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, sparkling wines and spirits produced in Italy | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2005 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |