USPTO serial 76265355
RENTACRATE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENTACRATE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Kurtz
JAMES L KURTZ LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVESTE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Transportation by truck and storage of containers and boxes containing documents, printed matter, computer tapes, computer discs, computer records and computer documents; messenger services, namely collecting and delivering of parcels and documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transportation and Storage of Containers and boxes containing documents, printed matter, computer tapes, computer discs, computer records and computer documents; messenger services; namely, collecting and delivering of parcels and documents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |