USPTO serial 76265872
PARK CITY SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3007595Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARK CITY SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Preston C. Regehr
PRESTON C REGEHR PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER201 S MAIN STSTE 1800SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and user manuals sold as a unit therewith for use in the healthcare industry for implementation and optimization of laboratory and clinical best practices office systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 037 | maintenance and repair of computer hardware; installation of computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 041 | computer education and training services, namely, classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, and on-site training for the health care industry in the field of computer system operations, usage, integrating, networking, programming, and records | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2001 |
| 042 | Installation of computer software; consulting services in the health care industry, namely, computer systems consulting; computer system support services, namely, remote, on-site and periodic monitoring and maintenance of computer systems in the health care industry; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others in the field of health care; non-downloadable computer software for use in the healthcare industry provided to end users as an online service | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Park City Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Park City Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Park City Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PARK CITY SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |