USPTO serial 76266146
ROBERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2004
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROBERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Laubscher, Sr.
LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER SR LAUBSCHER SEVERSON1160 SPA RD STE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DAIRY PRODUCTS -- NAMELY, FLUID MILK, VITAMIN D WHITE MILK, 2% WHITE MILK, 1% WHITE MILK, SKIM MILK, 2% CHOCOLATE MILK, 1/2% CHOCOLATE MILK, BUTTERMILK, HALF AND HALF, WHIP CREAM, TABLE CREAM, HALF AND HALF CREAMERS, NON DAIRY CREAMERS, OLD STYLE WHIP CREAM, BUTTER, OLEO, EGG NOG, SOUR CREAM, LOW FAT SOUR CREAM, DIPS LOW FAT DIPS, 4% COTTAGE CHEESE, 2% COTTAGE CHEESE, LOW FAT COTTAGE CHEESE, REGULAR YOGURT, LOW FAT YOGURT, RICOTTA CHEESE, AND VEGETABLE FAT COFFEE WHITENER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 032 | ORANGE JUICE, FRUIT DRINKS, LEMONADE, APPLE JUICE, GRAPE JUICE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Roberts Dairy Company
- Other trademarks owned by Roberts Dairy Company
- Other trademarks owned by Roberts Dairy Company
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named ROBERTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |