USPTO serial 76266534
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Barrie, ONTARIO, CA
Barrie, ONTARIO, CA
Barrie, ONTARIO, CA
UTOPIA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Debra Z. Anderson
ERIC A LERNER ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Non-metal traps and fittings therefor for use in catch basins and manholes of storm or drainage water systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PG1B | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DELETE 1(B) FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |