Drawing for AIRPRIME

USPTO serial 76266563

AIRPRIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALL, ALLISON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRPRIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett, Esq.

MARLENE J WILLIAMS THELEN REID & PRIEST LLPPO BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-0187UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software for use in facilitating wireless communication and data transmission between portable hardware devices via wireless frequency bands; computer hardware, namely modules for use in facilitating wireless communication between portable hardware devices via wireless frequency bandsACTIVE—
035Licensing of computer hardware and software for use in facilitating wireless communication and date transmission between portable hardware devices via wireless frequency bandsACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of messages and data via wireless frequency bandsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely design for others of computer hardware and software for use in facilitating wireless communication and data transmission between portable hardware devices via wireless frequency bandsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 7, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 31, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance