Drawing for CUCKOO

USPTO serial 76267321

CUCKOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2710639Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2003
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUCKOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William E. Marames

WILLIAM E MARAMES ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric rice cookers, electric pressure rice cookers, electric toasters, electric dish dryers, fans-air conditioning, electric stoves, microwave ovens for cooking, humidifiers for central heating radiators, clothes dryers, electric cookers, deep electric fryers, electric liquid heaters and inverter lampsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2004C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 30, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Apr 29, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance