Drawing for LEADER

USPTO serial 76267482

LEADER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEADER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Phillip Chandler, III

JAMES PHILLIP CHANDLER THE CHANDLER LAW FIRM10621 RIV RDPOTOMAC, MD 20854UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely electronic transmission of voice, data, information and imagesACTIVEAug 31, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2004MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Oct 28, 2004ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Mar 18, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 26, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 17, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 17, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance