USPTO serial 76267786
SKIN PRACTITIONERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKIN PRACTITIONERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P RYNKIEWICZ
MICHELLE C BURKE ESQ MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4700CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical services for skin and hair care, namely, chemical peels, acne treatments, microdermabrasion, botox and collagen injections, laser procedures for the removal of wrinkles, capillaries, red spots, brown spots, age spots, tattoos, spider veins, facial and body hair, laser procedures for stimulating collagen production, evening skin tone and skin resurfacing; rendering skin, cosmetic and hair consultation and advisory services; nursing care services and technical consultation and research in the field of skin products and treatments; hair styling services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |