Drawing for DISTINCTIVE CREATIONS

USPTO serial 76267814

DISTINCTIVE CREATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISTINCTIVE CREATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MONICA JOHNSON

MONICA JOHNSON SPRINGS INDUSTRIES INC205 N WHITE STFT MILL, SC 29715-1654UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL DRAPERY HARDWARE, NAMELY, DRAPERY TUBING AND TRACKS, FINIALS, BRACKETS, SUPPORTS, POLE RINGS, SLIDES AND CORD PULLEYSACTIVE—
020DRAPERY RODS AND POLES; NON-METAL DRAPERY HARDWARE, NAMELY, DRAPERY TUBING AND TRACKS, FINIALS, BRACKETS, SUPPORTS, POLE RINGS, SLIDES AND CORD PULLEYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 14, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance