Drawing for INLIGHT SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76267871

INLIGHT SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INLIGHT SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

V. Gerald Grafe, General Counsel

V. Gerald Grafe The Grafe Law Office, P.C.P.O. Box 2689Corrales, NM 87048UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments, namely optical instruments utilizing spectroscopy with multivariate analysis for analyte measurements in medical life science applications in the nature of medical diagnosis, medical treatment, patient monitoring, glucose measurement, and blood gas measurementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 2, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 2, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 7, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 23, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 23, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance