Drawing for TWINKALINK

USPTO serial 76268265

TWINKALINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWINKALINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lizbeth Hasse

LIZBETH HASSE CREATIVE INDUSTRY LAW GROUP526 COLUMBUS AVE 2ND FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in receiving electronic impulses sent by a disabled child through technology that assists them to send the impulses, and is suited to their disability, and allows the child to interact with the material being displayed on the computer screen used for educational purposes, namely, the education and instruction of children with disabilities; computer game programsACTIVE—
016Publications, namely, books featuring the common experiences of children with disabilities and their interaction with all childrenACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, games of skill, games of physical coordination, board games, puppets, hand held unit for playing electronic games and dolls, used for educational purposes, namely, the education and instruction of children with disabilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 18, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 19, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 18, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 13, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance