USPTO serial 76268678
INVISIBLE BUT EVERYWHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3073890Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2006
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INVISIBLE BUT EVERYWHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gaithersburg, MD, US
Gaithersburg, MD, US
EXCELITAS NOBLELIGHT AMERICA LLC
GAITHERSBURG, MD, US
HERAEUS NOBLELIGHT AMERICA LLC
GAITHERSBURG, MD, US
Gaithersburg, MD, US
HERAEUS NOBLELIGHT FUSION UV INC.
GAITHERSBURG, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JILL M PIETRINI
Richard Y. Kim McDermott Will & Emery LLP500 North Capitol Street, N.W.The McDermott BuildingWashington, DC 20001-1531Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Material treatment services in the field of polymerizing coatings, inks, powders, composite structures and gels using ultraviolet light | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation services in the field of polymerizing coatings, inks, powders, composite structures and gels using ultraviolet light | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FUSION UV SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FUSION UV SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXCELITAS NOBLELIGHT AMERICA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HERAEUS NOBLELIGHT AMERICA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FUSION UV SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HERAEUS NOBLELIGHT FUSION UV INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INVISIBLE BUT EVERYWHERE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |