USPTO serial 76269035
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. Sanders
ROBERT H SANDERS NESTLE USALEGAL DEPT TRADEMARK SERVICE800 N BRAND BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91203-3213| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, COFFEE EXTRACTS AND COFFEE-BASED PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES; COFFEE SUBSTITUTES AND EXTRACTS OF COFFEE SUBSTITUTES; TEA, TEA EXTRACTS AND TEA-BASED PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES; COCOA AND PREPARATIONS HAVING A BASE OF COCOA; CHOCOLATE; CANDY, NATURAL SWEETENERS; BAKERY PRODUCTS, BREAD, YEAST, PASTRY; BISCUITS, CAKES, BAKERY DESSERTS, PUDDINGS; ICE CREAM; HONEY AND HONEY SUBSTITUTES; BREAKFAST CEREALS; RICE; PASTA; PREPARATIONS MADE FROM FLOUR AND CEREALS; SAUCES; SEASONINGS FOR FOOD; SALAD DRESSINGS; MAYONNAISE | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE AND PROVIDING ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING THERETO; BUSINESS RECORD KEEPING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FOODSTUFFS AND CATERING; COOPERATIVE ADVERTISING; AGENCY SERVICES FOR THE IMPORTATION OF FOODSTUFFS AND FOR FOOD UTENSILS; BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF RESTAURANTS, CAFES, SNACK-BARS AND CANTEEN SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | RESTAURANT, HOTEL, CAFE, SNACK-BAR AND CANTEEN SERVICES; CATERING SERVICES; ANALYSIS AND QUALITY CONTROL OF FOODSTUFFS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |