USPTO serial 76269688
FORCE/DESIGN VIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORCE/DESIGN VIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. McKenna
JOHN F MCKENNA CESARI AND MCKENNA LLP88 BLACK FALCON AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2425UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT TESTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN OPERATING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT TESTERS; PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT INSPECTION STATIONS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE INSPECTION OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; AUTOMATED VISUAL INSPECTION STATIONS FOR PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE INSPECTION OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING ELECTRONICS FACTORY INFORMATION; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR MAKING DIAGNOSES RELATING TO AUTOMOTIVE PROBLEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |