Drawing for DURASEAL

USPTO serial 76269735

DURASEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURASEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan J. Ross

ALAN J ROSS ARTER HADDENHUNTINGTON BLDG925 EUCLID AVE STE 1100CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1475

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017adhesive sealants and silicone rubber sealant for use in spacing glass panelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 9, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 9, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 12, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 12, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance