USPTO serial 76269735
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan J. Ross
ALAN J ROSS ARTER HADDENHUNTINGTON BLDG925 EUCLID AVE STE 1100CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1475| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | adhesive sealants and silicone rubber sealant for use in spacing glass panels | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |