Drawing for ENAVIS

USPTO serial 76270260

ENAVIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENAVIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diana Michelle Sobo

DIANA MICHELLE SOBO THBROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephone, telecommunications, Internet and data networking systems and equipment, namely, electronic and optical multiplexers, digital and optical cross connects, electrical and optical switches, electrical and optical telecommunication transmitters for vice and data, electrical and optical telecommunication receivers for voice and data; computer software and hardware for bandwidth management; element and network management computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance, and repair of telecommunications or data systems or networksACTIVE—
041Training services in the field of telecommunications, communications and data networkingACTIVE—
042Computer telecommunications systems or network systems design and engineering for others; computer consulting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance