USPTO serial 76270587
EL CAZO BURRITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EL CAZO BURRITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SIOUX CITY, IA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BURRITOS | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |