USPTO serial 76270725
MINUTE FITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINUTE FITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA
CREATIVE PRODUCT CONCEPTS, INC.
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karol A. Kepchar
KAROL A KEPCHAR AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-1564UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | series of pre recorded video tapes featuring instructions and demonstrations in the fields of fitness and exercise | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TelAmerica Media Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TelAmerica Media Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE PRODUCT CONCEPTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MINUTE FITNESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |