USPTO serial 76270832
PICCADILLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICCADILLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Salai
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP1600 BAUSCH & LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Snack foods namely potato chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |