Drawing for INTERDENT

USPTO serial 76272122

INTERDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jere M. Webb

JERE M WEBB STOEL RIVES LLP900 SW FIFTH AVE STE 2600PORTLAND, OR 97204-1268UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dental practice management services, namely, non-dental personnel hiring and administration, patient scheduling and billing, namely, preparation of financial statement, payment of payables and billing receivables; cooperative advertising and marketing services, and buying clubsACTIVE—
042On-line patient information regarding dental practices and procedures; quality assurances services in the field of dentistryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 16, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance