USPTO serial 76272483
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman, , Michael S. Sherman, Esq., Bernard R. Gans, Esq., Elizabeth Barrowman Gibson, Esq., Brian W. Kasell, Esq., Christine L. Lofgren, Esq., Grant T. Langton, Esq., Victor K. Sapphire, Esq., George Tseng, Esq., Steven R. Hansen, Esq.
ROD S BERMAN MICHAEL S SHERMAN JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP7TH FL1900 AVE OF THE STARSLOS ANGELES, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES TO SENIOR CITIZENS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |