USPTO serial 76272488
MED KEEPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MED KEEPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIANN R. D. SMITH
JULIANN R D SMITH GOETECH LLC D B A MEDKEEPER2727 BRYANT ST STE 250DENVER, CO 80211-4181UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND A HAND HELD ELECTRONIC UNIT USED FOR KEEPING TRACK OF PATIENT MEDICATION SCHEDULE, MEDICATION CONSUMPTION, MEDICATION CONTRAINDICATIONS, AND/OR MEDICAL HISTORY DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |