USPTO serial 76272551
Serial No. 76272551
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76272551?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY J. NELSON
GARY J NELSON CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME, MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED, AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES, JAMS, FRUIT SAUCES; EGGS, MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS, EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK, AND FROZEN YOGURT; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; BEVERAGES, NAMELY, MILK-BASED BEVERAGES CONTAINING COFFEE; FROZEN SEAFOOD AND FRESH SEAFOOD | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | MILK PRODUCTS, NAMELY, ICE CREAM, ICE MILK, FROZEN YOGURT; BEVERAGES, NAMELY, COFFEE-BASED BEVERAGES CONTAINING MILK; BREWED COFFEE, COFFEE BEANS, ROASTED COFFEE AND NOODLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |