USPTO serial 76272580
FLEX - BATTLE OF THE BICEPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEX - BATTLE OF THE BICEPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman Zafman
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded audio-cassettes, audio discs, audio tapes, compact discs, computer programs, CD Rom, interactive videos, DAT mini compact discs, tapes and pre-recorded videos featuring body building contests and contestants | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing namely, aprons, footwear, athletic footwear, head bands, sweat bands, bathing suits, bathing trunks, bathrobes, belts, cloth bibs, blouses, boxer shorts, caps, coats, dresses, footwear, gloves, hats, jackets, jogging suits, leg warmers, leotards, mittens, neck ties, nightgowns, night shirts, pajamas, play suits, pants, panties, sweat pants, polo shirts, pullovers, scarves, shirts, sweat shirts, golf shirts, T-shirts, socks, sneakers, shorts, suits, jump suits, jogging suits, sweaters, sun visors, t-shirts, tennis wear and vests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Weider Publications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Weider Publications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FLEX - BATTLE OF THE BICEPS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |