USPTO serial 76272590
FOXLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOXLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Tu-Cheng City, Taipei Hsien, TW
Other trademarks owned by HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Tu-Cheng City, Taipei Hsien, TW
Other trademarks owned by HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Fetterley
DANIEL D FETTERLEY ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC SOCKETS; ELECTRIC PLUGS; ELECTRICAL ADAPTERS; ELECTRIC SWITCHES; FIBER OPTICAL CABLES AND CONNECTORS, SOCKETS, PLUGS, AND ADAPTERS THEREFOR; FLEXIBLE PRINTED CIRCUIT SUBSTRATES; BATTERY CHARGERS; COMMUNICATIONS WIRE AND CABLES; COMPUTER NETWORK WIRE AND CABLES; ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION DEVICES FOR MOBILE PHONE COMPRISING A WIRELESS EARPHONE AND WIRELESS MICROPHONE; LASER DIODES; LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; PHOTOELECTRIC DETECTORS; PUMPED LASERS; OPTICAL TRANSCEIVERS; OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS; OPTICAL RECEIVERS; OPTICAL AMPLIFIER MODULES; OPTICAL CONNECTORS; OPTICAL ISOLATORS; OPTICAL COUPLERS; OPTICAL ATTENUATORS; OPTICAL SWITCHES; OPTICAL MODULATORS; OPTICAL CIRCULATORS; OPTICAL POLARIZERS; OPTICAL FILTERS; OPTICAL GRATINGS; INTEGRATED OPTICAL CIRCUITS; WAVEGUIDES; WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXERS; AND OPTICAL ADD/DROP MULTIPLEXERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |