USPTO serial 76272989
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald A. DiCerbo
RONALD A DICERBO MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTD500 W MADISON ST34TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60661-2511| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing evaluation, rating and shadow rating of Individual loans within a pool of loans over a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jul 16, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |